Why Quebec has not — yet — signed Canada’s direct-to-consumer alcohol sales

Nine Canadian provinces will soon allow wineries, distilleries, and breweries to sell their alcohol directly to consumers outside their home provinces, but Quebec has not yet signed the agreement.

So why is Quebec staying on the sidelines?

This move is part of a broader effort to dismantle interprovincial trade barriers across Canada, allowing manufacturers to sell alcohol beyond their home provinces. Premiers say the changes are especially important as the U.S. continues to threaten hefty tariffs on Canadian exports.

This week, U.S. President Donald Trump announced new 50 per cent tariffs on many Canadian products — including alcohol.

Yukon and Quebec did not sign the agreement. Nunavut and the Northwest Territories said they would not sign it, citing the “unique realities of our territories.”

In a post on X, Premier Christine Fréchette said Quebec supports the objectives of the agreement, but that adhering to it would require amendments to Quebec’s laws in order for the deal to take effect.

“These changes can be made as soon as the Quebec legislature resumes its session,” she wrote.

“We are counting on the co-operation of all political stakeholders in Quebec to ensure the agreement’s implementation.”

Quebec signed a memorandum of understanding on this initiative a year ago.

Deal could raise technical, financial, legal questions

Frédéric Laurin, an economics professor at Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, said Quebec might be “a bit hesitant” because the agreement could be a way to bypass the Société des alcools du Québec’s monopoly.

Quebec’s state-run liquor retailer collects a significant markup on alcoholic products sold in the province, and Laurin said it’s still unclear how that revenue would be handled under the new deal.

“Who will collect the surcharge if one is imposed? Is it the province where the product is manufactured or the province where it’s purchased?” he asked.

He also noted that Quebec might be weighing technical, financial, and legal questions, including international trade obligations.

Foreign wineries, Laurin explained, could argue they should receive the same access to consumers as Canadian producers.

“You have to be on each monopoly’s list of [approved] products to be sold in the province,” Laurin explained, pointing out that the list is “relatively restrictive.”

He added that if Quebec signs the deal, foreign wineries could challenge the agreement in court under international treaties.

For those reasons, Laurin expects Quebec’s accession to the deal to drag on.