Finance News

B.C. judge orders WestJet to stop telling unhappy passengers the sky’s not


A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ordered WestJet to stop telling passengers there’s a limit to how much they can claim for expenses incurred by flight delays and cancellations.

Justice John Gibb-Carsley issued the interim injunction in New Westminster, B.C., Friday ahead of a trial set for next year over claims from a passenger advocacy group that statements around reimbursements found on the airline’s website were deceptive.

WestJet has since changed the wording to remove maximums for hotel and meal costs — but the judge decided an order was still warranted to prohibit the airline or its employees “from communicating that same information to passengers in other forms.”

Gábor Lukács heads the organization that initiated the lawsuit — literally called the Air Passenger Rights group.

“I am very pleased that a court agreed with our position,” Lukács told CBC News. 

‘Food and drink in reasonable quantities’

Lukács’s group sued WestJet last year in response to guidelines found on the web page where passengers were sent to submit requests for reimbursement because of flight delays or cancellations.

The original language said, “WestJet will reimburse you up to $150.00 CAD ($200.00 CAD for non-Canadian destinations)” and “meal expenses to a maximum of $45 CAD per day/per guest.”

Man standing outside, looking at camera, smirking.
Air passenger advocate Gábor Lukács heads the group that won an interim injunction against WestJet ahead of a trial over the way the airline communicates with passengers over claims for delay. ( David Laughlin/CBC)

The airline also claimed it would not reimburse expenses for “cellular roaming charges, missed entertainment/sporting/excursion events, lost wages or missed connections to non-partner airlines or cruises.”

In court documents, the advocacy group points to the Montreal Convention, an international treaty governing the rights and obligations of carriers that has been incorporated into Canadian law.

“The Montreal Convention does not provide limits for specific out-of-pocket expenses such as $250 for accommodations, $50 for food, $10 for roaming fees,” the lawsuit reads.

“Imposing such limits would be contrary to Article 26 of the Montreal Convention.”

Under those rules, Lukács says passengers are entitled to a maximum of just under $12,000 for delay.

Within two weeks of the filing of the lawsuit, WestJet changed the language relating to reimbursement on its website.

“Guests may be entitled to food and drink in reasonable quantities and access to means of communication,” the new wording reads.

“When recovery from a flight cancellation involves an overnight stay, guests may be entitled to a hotel or comparable accommodation within a reasonable distance from the airport and transportation between the airport and the accommodations.”

Airline claims changes make lawsuit moot

WestJet has denied the allegation of deceptive business practices. 

In its response to the lawsuit, the company argues the changes it has already made render the lawsuit itself moot: “The revised…



Read More: B.C. judge orders WestJet to stop telling unhappy passengers the sky’s not

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More