Glencore PLC is currently deeply, and perhaps rightly, discounted by the

Why is it that the share price of () is lagging behind the other major miners?

The effect is clear enough. Allowing for the steep declines brought about by the coronavirus and the subsequent partial recoveries, Anglo American () is down by 13.7% over the past six months, BHP () by just over 7.5%, and Rio Tinto () by a remarkably modest 0.7%.

All to the good, since the world is beginning to pull out of the crisis, many commodities are coming back into demand, while supply disruptions continue to put upward pressure on selling prices.

Glencore’s shares, though, have been much weaker, down more than 26% over the past six months, and currently trading at around 172p.

That’s a significant underperformance, much of which can be attributed Glencore’s lack of iron ore production. Iron ore is riding high, and is helping to bolster the other companies in a way that doesn’t apply to Glencore. But it’s also tempting to put a part of the malaise down to ongoing legal worries in regard to operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The DRC is famously one of the most corrupt jurisdictions in the world to operate in, but is also one of the most richly endowed of the African nations in terms of copper, cobalt and gold in particular.

Of all the world’s significant miners, Glencore has the biggest exposure to the DRC, where it has in the past rubbed shoulders with notorious types like Dan Gertler, a man who has been on the wrong side of investigations more than once.

The latest legal woes for Glencore strike closer to home, though, and have been filed in Switzerland, where it’s based. The precise nature of the charges seem somewhat nebulous: the company is charged by the Swiss attorney general that it failed to put measures in place to prevent corruption.

Such is the nature of modern regulation that you can be charged for not doing things, as well as for doing them. But Glencore itself has, in the past, suggested there may be some substance to charges such as these, in the sense that local traders may well have been operating beyond their authority and outside of company policy.

What’s perhaps more significant for those worried about fundamentals, though, is that Glencore’s underperformance, though triggered by the coronavirus crisis, also follows a recent re-statement of a long-standing intent by chief executive Ivan Glasenberg that there will be management changes at the top level of the company.

Such changes may even include a changing of the guard at the very top. And if Glasenberg were to leave, it would certainly put a downer on investor sentiment. He is the public face of the company, and the man widely credited with bringing it up to a position where it trades in a peer group with the other major miners.

All things must pass, but Glasenberg’s passing would certainly herald a new round of unease about the future.

Will he stay…